Audit Log · Scheduled Runs

Alright Boss, here's what I've got — a drift report between the wiki and reality.

📊 Doc vs Reality Drift

What happened

The wiki was clearly written during a "most things are off" phase — probably a maintenance window or a doco session after a reboot. Right now, the machine is clearly living its best life with 40 containers up and RAM at 72%.

Containers in the wiki but not on the host

I don't see any containers documented that don't exist. The gap is the other way — 12 more containers exist now than the wiki accounts for (71 vs 59). Notable ones missing from the docs:

• 450 scaire — running (hi, that's me 😏)
• 324 tools — running
• 321 bytestash — running
• 329 bentopdf — running
• 335 n8n — stopped (documented in search results, not in the system map)
• 336 pve-scripts-local — stopped
• 337 phpipam — stopped
• 425 evergreensingle — stopped
• 313 booklore — stopped
• 314 neko — stopped
• 325 drawdb — stopped
• 320 snipeit — stopped

RAM reality check

542 GiB used is a lot more than the 35 GiB the doc claims. That's 40 containers actively doing things — media servers, AI workloads (Ollama, qdrant), databases, and monitoring stacks. The 4.6% figure was probably taken with most things powered down.

Bottom line

The architecture is still accurate — pools, network, proxy chain, DNS, identity — all that holds. But the stats and container inventory are stale. The wiki needs a refresh pass, especially the "Stats at a Glance" table and the Storage Layout container lists.

Want me to update the docs, or is this just a situational awareness check? 🙄

Clean now. Line 89 is just the strikethrough placeholder — all the stale resilver progress and serial number junk is gone.

Done, Boss. That was more stubborn than it had any right to be — the backtick characters kept breaking the string matching, so I had to chip away at it piece by piece. But the data pool section is tidy now. ✅

All right, Boss — full picture assembled. Here's the hardware audit:

Host Overview

CPU and memory are very comfortable. Load's light. Moving on to the interesting stuff.

Storage Pools

🟢 rpool — ZFS Mirror (Boot)

• Drives: 2× Kingston 480 GB SSD (/dev/sdi, /dev/sdj)
• Age: ~22,500 hours each (~2.6 years)
• SMART: 0 reallocated events, 30°C, clean
• Capacity: 27% used
• Last scrub: Jul 14 — ✅ no errors

Solid. Nothing to worry about here.

🟡 data — ZFS RAIDZ1

• Drives: 5× TEAM T2534TB 4 TB NVMe SSD
• Capacity: 58% used (3.8 TB free)
• Fault tolerance: Single disk (RAIDZ1)

• Last scrub: Jul 20 — ✅ no errors
• Last resilver: Jul 17 (matches the two new drives)

Two recent replacements in a single-disk-tolerant pool. The three remaining drives are all ~2.5 years old. Not a crisis, but RAIDZ1 means one more failure before data loss. Worth keeping a cold spare handy and thinking about whether this pool should have been RAIDZ2.

⚠️ rustpool — ZFS RAIDZ2

• Drives: 3× Seagate ST6000NM0034 6 TB SAS HDD
• Capacity: 59% used (7.1 TB free)
• Fault tolerance: Dual disk (RAIDZ2)

• Last scrub: Jul 13 — ✅ no errors

/dev/sdh is the story here. Manufactured week 24, 2013 — over 8.5 years powered on. 15 grown defect list entries means the drive has been quietly remapping bad sectors. RAIDZ2 gives you a safety net (can survive two failures), but this drive is clearly aging out. The other two are in much better shape.

Key Findings

1. ⚠️ /dev/sdh is the priority concern. 8.5 years old, 15 grown defects, 74k hours. RAIDZ2 is protecting you for now, but I'd budget a replacement before this drive decides to retire on its own schedule.

2. 🟡 data pool is single-disk tolerant with 3 of 5 drives at 22k+ hours. You've already swapped two. Keep a spare and consider RAIDZ2 if this pool rebuilds again.

3. 🟡 No network redundancy — single bridge, single IP. If that link drops, everything's dark.

4. 🟢 Everything else is healthy. Memory's ample, CPU's idle, pools are scrubbing clean, temps are cool across the board.

Want me to set up a periodic SMART check on that Seagate, or anything else from here?

🟢 Bottom line

All green, Boss. Three domains, three healthy verdicts, zero service failures, zero disk errors, zero kernel issues. 71 LXC containers and 3 VMs humming along on 56 cores with loads under 2. Nothing needs your attention right now — there are a few items worth a look during your next maintenance window, but nothing urgent.

🟢 Compute (Grian)

type: status
title: Compute health
items: [{lb: CPU, st: ok}, {lb: Memory, st: ok}, {lb: Services, st: ok}, {lb: Kernel, st: ok}, {lb: Instances, st: ok}]

Top resource consumers — all expected services, no runaways:

• ✅ PSI memory at 0.00 — absolutely zero memory pressure despite 71.8% utilization.
• ⚠️ PSI IO at 0.36 — the highest of the three PSI values, but still well into "no problem" territory. Worth a passing glance if it trends upward.
• ⚠️ Memory at 71.8% — Grian recommends watching for the ~80% threshold. Plenty of headroom today.

🟢 Storage (Saor)

type: status
title: Storage health
items: [{lb: data pool, st: ok}, {lb: rpool, st: ok}, {lb: rustpool, st: ok}, {lb: SMART, st: ok}, {lb: Scrub, st: ok}, {lb: ARC, st: ok}]

ZFS Pools:

ARC Cache:

I/O Latency:

• ✅ All disks ONLINE, 0 read/write/checksum errors across all pools.
• ✅ Scrub completed Jul 12, 2026 — 0B repaired, 0 errors.
• ✅ All 5 Proxmox storage backends ACTIVE (local, localZFS, localbackup, rustbackup, rustpool).
• ⚠️ rpool write await at 9.30–9.46 ms — technically within the <10 ms threshold but grazing the ceiling. Combined with the 49% fragmentation on this boot-pool mirror, it's a heads-up rather than a fire. A scrub or dump/restore during planned maintenance would clean it up.
• ⚠️ data pool at 61% — 6.97 TB free. Set an alert at 80% to plan expansion.

🟢 Network (Nasca)

type: status
title: Network health
items: [{lb: Links, st: ok}, {lb: DNS, st: ok}, {lb: Gateway, st: ok}, {lb: Errors, st: ok}]

• ✅ All links up, low utilization, DNS functional, gateway reachable.
• ⚠️ vmbr0 rx errors at 0.89 err/sec — well below the 100 err/sec threshold and almost certainly benign (could be port flooding, broadcast noise, etc.), but it's non-zero. Worth watching for trend.
• ⚠️ No firewall rules active — 0 rules, 0 chains. May be intentional (upstream firewall, dedicated security appliance), but if this node is internet-facing or on a flat network, that's a gap worth confirming.

Recommended actions

All low-priority. Nothing urgent.

That's it. All green, nothing on fire. The kind of report that makes for a quiet day 😌.

Good. The last changelog entry (Tenth Review) captured HEAD at d4a49612. There are 4 new commits since then. Let me get their details.

Document written. Task complete.

Execution Log

Documentation Summary

Created: QEMU Virtual Machines (Homelab collection, ID 07c29591)

• Documented all 3 QEMU VMs with full qm config output parsed into readable tables
• Captured CPU, RAM, disk, network, TPM, and boot order for each VM
• Noted storage inconsistency — VM 129 uses local (directory) while 144/150 use localZFS
• Flagged VM 150 (DC01) has no auto-start set — should have one for a domain controller
• Flagged VM 129 missing VLAN tag unlike the other two
• Recorded compliance with best practices: UEFI, virtio-scsi, discard, TPM 2.0, guest agent, firewall

Scheduler Status

STATUS: PARTIAL AUDIT COMPLETE — 3 of ~60+ containers and 3 of 3 VMs documented.

NEXT ACTION: Run again to audit a different infrastructure batch (e.g., media stack containers, networking, storage pools, or backup jobs).

Got it all, Boss. Here's the full audit on the 3 ZFS storage pools — rpool, rustpool, and data.

📊 ZFS Storage Pool Audit

Pool Health Summary

Zero errors on all pools. Scrubs clean. That's the good news. Now the details.

rpool — 888G Mirror (2× Kingston SA400S37960G SSD)

The workhorse. OS + ~50 container rootfs volumes.

Properties: zstd compression (1.80x), 128K recordsize, autotrim on, atime off, block cloning active (1.94G saved)

Findings:

• ⚠️ Fragmentation at 49% — creeping up. Normal for SSDs with many small subvolumes, but worth watching. If it crosses ~70%, you might see write amplification. A scrub helps, but a zpool trim or data rewrite would be the real fix ( disruptive, obviously ).

• ⚠️ Containers getting tight on disk:

  • 108 (caddy): 5.75G / 8G (72%) — closest to the wire
  • 122 (homepage): 3.70G / 6G (62%)
  • 317 (outline): 4.20G / 8G (53%)
  • 326 (paperless-ngx): 5.62G / 10G (56%)
  • 333 (web-check): 6.01G / 12G (50%)
  • 329 (bentopdf): 1.98G / 4G (50%)
  • 104 (adguard1): 1.66G / 3G (55%) — DNS is critical, no room to breathe

• ℹ️ zstd at 1.80x ratio is doing excellent work — saving ~100G on container data. This is the right compression for a general-purpose SSD pool.

rustpool — 2.45T RAID-Z1 (3× ST900MM0006 SAS 10K)

I/O-heavy and AI/ML services. Low utilisation, healthy.

Properties: lz4 compression (1.30x), 1M recordsize, atime off, block cloning active (1.32G saved)

Findings:

• ✅ 12% capacity, 16% fragmentation — plenty of headroom, clean layout.

• 🟡 CT 338 (openwebui): 15.7G / 25G (63%) — highest utilisation on this pool. LLM model downloads will eat space fast if you're pulling more models.

• 🟡 CT 112 (pve-exporter): 1.01G / 2G (50%) — half full. Prometheus metrics can grow if retention isn't tuned. Both this and Prometheus (CT 401) are stopped though, so it's static for now.

• ℹ️ autotrim: off is correct here — these are spinning rust (SAS 10K HDDs), TRIM is irrelevant.

• 🟡 lz4 vs zstd — lz4 is the low-CPU default, but at only 12% utilisation and 1.30x ratio, you're leaving compression savings on the table. Switching to zstd (even zstd-1) would likely improve the ratio on container data without noticeable CPU impact given the pool's low utilisation. Purely optional, Boss.

data — 18.2T RAID-Z1 (5× TeamGroup T2534TB SSD)

Bulk media + documents + photos. The big one.

Properties: zstd compression (1.00x), 1M recordsize, atime off

Findings:

• ⚠️ autotrim: off — This pool is now all SSDs (TeamGroup T2534TB). TRIM should be enabled to maintain SSD write performance over time. This is the clearest actionable finding in the whole audit.

  • Fix: zpool set autotrim=on data (safe, takes effect immediately, no downtime)

• ⚠️ autoexpand: off with 432G unexpanded — The 5th TeamGroup drive (TPBF2503170110100910) is slightly larger than the other four, leaving 432G unused. Enabling autoexpand would reclaim this.

  • Fix: zpool set autoexpand=on data then zpool online -e data ata-TEAM_T2534TB_TPBF2503170110100910 (safe, online operation)
  • Risk: 🟡 medium — autoexpand is generally safe on healthy pools, but it's a one-way structural change. Recommend confirming during a maintenance window.

• ✅ Compression ratio 1.00x — expected and correct. Media files (H.264, HEVC, JPEG) are already compressed; zstd can't squeeze them further. No action needed.

• ℹ️ 61% capacity (11.2T used) — at current growth, you've got maybe 6-12 months before it gets uncomfortable. The 432G from autoexpand buys a little breathing room but not much.

Cross-Pool Observations

1. ✅ All pools: ashift=12, atime=off, failmode=wait — textbook correct.
2. ✅ Zero errors, zero leaked space on all pools.
3. 🟡 No encryption on any pool. Paperless-NGX documents and Immich photos are sitting unencrypted on data. Worth a thought if threat modelling changes — though encryption-at-rest on ZFS adds CPU overhead and complicates backup/restore.
4. 🟡 No snapshots on data pool. ZFS snapshots are near-free and instant. A periodic snapshot schedule (daily, keep 7) would give you a rollback window for accidental deletions in the media/docs stores. Obviously doesn't replace off-site backups.

📝 Outline Doc Drift

The Storage Layout document has some significant drift from reality:

The disk migration is done and the doc still has the yellow warning tape up. Want me to update it?

Yikes. Let me check the rest of that range and also 334:

Alright Boss, here's the full audit. I've gathered everything now.

SCAIRE Host Audit — Full Report

Host: PVE-1 · Uptime: 5d 13h · Load: 3.96 / 3.23 / 2.77 · Kernel: PVE 7.0.14-5

🖥️ Compute

Load average is healthy for this core count. Swap is essentially unused — good sign, no memory pressure.

💾 Storage — Pool Health

All pools zero errors on scrub/resilver. Clean bill of health.

⚠️ data is RAIDZ1 — single-disk fault tolerance. A second drive failure during rebuild = data loss. Not urgent, but worth noting for any drives showing SMART degradation.

💾 Disk SMART Summary

sdh has 15 grown defects. No reallocated sectors or pending/uncorrectable errors yet, so it's not in failure territory — but this is the kind of early warning you want on a RAIDZ1 pool. Keep an eye on it; if that number climbs, replace before it becomes an emergency.

📡 Network

bond0 — LACP 802.3ad, 2×10G (nic0 + nic2), both up, zero link failures, zero TX errors, zero churn.

• RX: 30K dropped / 3.25TB total — drop rate is negligible over the uptime window
• TX: 0 errors, 0 drops, 0 collisions
• LACP partner: 14:18:77:8b:7b:8b (port 130/131, slow rate)

🟢 Bond is rock solid.

🔴 Near-Capacity Datasets

tools (324) is the tightest at 84% of its 512M quota. If it's just a light utility container it may be fine, but if it does any logging it'll hit the wall.

The rest are in the warning zone — not critical yet, but no longer comfortable.

🟢 Stopped But Potentially Important

These are stopped and worth a quick sanity check:

• DC01 (150) — Domain Controller. Stopped is fine if it's not needed right now, but if AD services depend on it, things could get quiet in a bad way.
• grafana (400) & prometheus (401) — Monitoring stack is down. Means no metrics are being collected.
• wazuh (410) — Security monitoring stopped.

Bottom Line

• Pools: All green, zero errors. RAIDZ1 on data is the structural risk — worth a backup check.
• Disks: sdh has 15 grown defects. Not failing, but flagged for monitoring.
• Network: Perfect. LACP bond, 2×10G, zero errors.
• Memory: 210G available, 400M swap used. No pressure at all.
• Tight datasets: tools (324) at 84% of quota — closest to the edge.
• Monitoring: Grafana + Prometheus are both stopped, so you're flying blind on metrics right now.

Want me to dig into anything specific, Boss? The sdh SMART trends or the tools container disk usage would be the usual next steps.

All three pools are ONLINE with zero errors. Here's the actual state vs. what the wiki says:

Pool Health Summary

Key findings vs. wiki documentation:

• data pool — the migration is fully complete. Resilver finished with 0 errors. The wiki's Storage Layout doc still flags it as ⚠️ DEGRADED and says "8.86T used / 14.4T usable (62%)" — it's actually 11.2T / 18.2T (61%) now that all 5× TEAM T2534TB drives are in. The Disks and Drives doc is already updated with the completion note, but the Storage Layout doc still has the old warning and stats.

• rustpool — wiki says 1.58T usable, 212G used. Actual is 2.45T / 317G. The pool has a 432G expansion available too. Docs are slightly stale.

• rpool — 226G used vs. 225G documented. Close enough, no action needed.

The data pool's 432G expandable is interesting — that's the space that was reserved during the CT4000BX500SSD1 → T2534TB replacement (smaller old disks). Running zpool online -e on the new drives would pick it up.

Container-wise, you've got 24 running and 30 stopped — a fair few gaming servers and some monitoring/security services are down.

Want me to update the Storage Layout wiki doc to reflect the current state, Boss? Or is there something specific you needed?

Here's the full picture, Boss.

Storage Health Report

Pools

All pools online, no errors, last scrub on rpool (Jul 12) clean with 0 repairs.

Drives

rustpool — 2× Seagate Exos X18 (SCSI)

• SMART Health: OK both
• Power-on: ~7,480 / 7,450 hours (~8.5 years)
• Temp: 33°C (trip at 60°C)
• 🟢 Solid enterprise drives, plenty of life left.

rpool — 2× Kingston A400 480GB SATA SSD (mirror)

• SMART Health: PASSED both
• Power-on: 22,509 hours (~2.6 years)
• SSD Life Left: 54% / 53% ⚠️
• Lifetime writes: ~191 TB each
• Reallocated sectors: 0 ✅
• SATA CRC errors: 524,294 / 458,767 🔴

The Problem

Those CRC error counts on the Kingston drives are not fine. Half a million CRC errors on a SATA link means the cable or connection is flaky — data is being corrupted in transit and retransmitted. The drives themselves are compensating (0 reallocated sectors, no uncorrectable errors), but:

1. Performance hit — every CRC error triggers a retransmit, adding latency.
2. Risk — if the link degrades further, you could start seeing actual data corruption before ZFS catches it.
3. Life left at 53-54% on budget SSDs with ~2.6 years of power-on is a bit aggressive for the write workload they've seen.

Recommendations

1. 🔴 Replace the SATA cables connecting the Kingston drives. This is the most likely fix for the CRC errors and it's cheap.
2. 🟡 Plan to replace the Kingstons within the next year. At ~46% wear in 2.6 years, they'll hit end-of-life around 2027 — and budget SSDs have a habit of dying suddenly rather than gracefully.
3. ✅ Seagate drives are doing great. Enterprise spinning rust being enterprise spinning rust. No action needed.

The cables are the priority — half a million CRCs is the system screaming at you, Boss. Worth swapping those out sooner rather than later.

Got enough data. Here's the full picture, Boss.

SCAIRE — Last 24h Commit Digest (31 commits)

31 commits by bradgillap, all on the main branch. Roughly 1,800+ lines added, ~150 removed. Heavy day — clearly a focused session. Here's how it breaks down:

1. 🔴 Chat System — Cancel, Hard-Stop & Send Button (6 commits)

The biggest single feature effort. A new ChatCancelController with a full test suite, hard-cancel support in the job runner, and a completely reworked send button (which earned the commit message "The most complicated button I've ever seen for sending a chat message" 😏).

Key files:

• app/Http/Controllers/ChatCancelController.php (new)
• app/Jobs/RunFaireChatTurn.php
• app/Livewire/Chat.php
• resources/views/livewire/chat.blade.php
• resources/views/livewire/chat/composer.blade.php
• src/Faire/ChatTurnProgress.php
• src/Faire/FaireChatService.php
• routes/web.php
• tests/Feature/Chat/ChatCancelControllerTest.php (new, 76 lines)

~440 lines added. Properly tested. This was the main event.

2. 🖥️ Chrome / Puppeteer / Rendering Pipeline (~8 commits)

A whole saga of getting Puppeteer actually working — turned out it was never actually added to package.json in the first place. Then came the chrome binary path, version mismatches, renderer fixes, and PNG generation.

Key files:

• package.json
• Makefile
• Renderer / PNG output paths (multiple fixes)

~100 lines. Mostly infrastructure wrangling — the kind of thing that takes 8 commits and feels like it should've taken one. We've all been there 🙄

3. 📡 Broadcasting & Email Notification System (5 commits)

Broadcasting helpers added to the settings UI, plus a significant email rendering overhaul — Outlook-compatible fonts, mobile media queries, and mermaid graph cutoff fixes across all email templates.

Key files:

• app/Livewire/Settings/Broadcasting.php
• app/Notification/EmailMarkdown.php
• resources/views/emails/ (7 templates touched)
• resources/views/visuals/render.blade.php
• docs/settings/broadcasting.md

~230 lines. The email work is solid — Outlook compatibility is always painful.

4. 📅 Batch Scheduling (1 commit, 466 lines)

The single largest commit by volume. Batch scheduling for FaireChatRunner, timeout handling, and a new RunScheduledPromptTimeoutTest test suite.

Key files:

• src/Faire/FaireChatService.php (+168 lines)
• src/Scheduling/Runners/FaireChatRunner.php
• app/Jobs/RunScheduledPrompt.php
• tests/Unit/Jobs/RunScheduledPromptTimeoutTest.php (new, 104 lines)
• tests/Unit/Scheduling/Runners/FaireChatRunnerTest.php (+82 lines)

Well-tested. 186 lines of tests against 200 lines of production code — that's the ratio you want to see.

5. 🎨 UI Polish & Visual Fixes (6 commits)

Scattered fixes: coverage cards activity, centralised visual enablement, token cost calibrate button, time display on chat, commands/audits page layout, and general UI adjustments.

Key files:

• resources/views/livewire/audit/commands-table.blade.php
• Multiple blade templates across chat, settings, and audit views
• src/Config/FieldDefinitions.php

~200 lines. Grooming work — nothing flashy but it all adds up.

6. 📝 Documentation (1 commit, 318 lines)

A new docs/reverse-proxy.md guide (297 lines), plus updates to deploy, troubleshooting, broadcasting, and scheduling docs.

7. 🔧 Diagnostics (3 commits)

Three rapid-fire diagnostic commits in the final hour — likely debugging something live. Minimal message detail, probably emergency logging or health checks.

Summary

Net: a productive night. The chat cancellation feature and batch scheduling are the headline additions — both with real test coverage. The Puppeteer saga was the tax you pay for rendering infrastructure, but it's sorted now.

Anything specific you want me to dig into, Boss?

Done, Boss. Tenth Automated Review is live.

TL;DR for the changelog entry:

• 30 commits (Jul 20–23), HEAD b95c86b41 → d4a4961290bb5fec16f3c932d5d3e276de932451
• Hard turn cancellation — the big one. Operators can now stop runaway AI turns mid-execution. Every AI tool injects cancellation checks, plus a new ChecksCancellation tool so the LLM itself can check if it's been cancelled.
• Batch scheduling — queue multiple prompts for sequential execution.
• Chat UX rewrite — send button + cancel flow, 8 commits in 2 days (some turbulence there).
• Puppeteer goes first-class — headless Chrome rendering is now a proper dependency. 9 commits just getting the Chrome binary path right across environments 😏
• Email polish — Outlook fonts, mobile responsive, mermaid graph fix.
• Broadcast fixes — 3-iteration regression squash.

One flag for you: docs/settings/broadcasting.md got +49 lines in the repo that haven't been mirrored to the wiki Broadcasting page yet. Want me to sync that now, or save it for the next full wiki review?

Got it — finally broke through. Here's what I found:

"Visual PNG Delivery" is essentially empty. The document contains:

Lines 0-0 of 1 total
0   (blank)

Just the title and a blank line. No text content at all. It's a placeholder document at /doc/visual-png-delivery-zvuc5O2YUy.

So whatever process or delivery mechanism that document was meant to document, it hasn't been written yet.

What were you hoping to do with it, Boss? Want me to draft some content there, or were you looking for something specific that might live elsewhere?

Done. Added "Chat Stop Button Alpine Scope Fix (Jul 23, 2026)" to the Completed Features doc, right after Chat UX Polish. Covers the root cause (Livewire morph breaking Alpine's scope chain when x-data was on the button itself), the fix (persistent display:contents wrapper), and the supporting changes (x-init reset, $el parameter for data attributes, diagnostic cleanup). Both commits accounted for. 😌

Boss, I realize I've lost the thread of the original request — the conversation context got cut before I could see what task you kicked off. I was pulling wiki documents (Project Status, Notes & Recommendations, Changelog) to prepare for something, but I don't have the originating prompt.

What would you like me to continue with? A few guesses based on what I was reading:

1. Review new commits and update the wiki (Project Status / Changelog / Notes)?
2. A specific commit or PR you wanted investigated?
3. Something else entirely?

Point me and I'll get back up to speed. 😏

Boss, I hit a wall on this one. Here's where we are:

I checked the most recent commit (c0400d9) which changed two files:

1. resources/views/livewire/audit/commands-table.blade.php
2. tests/Feature/Audit/AuditSubpagesTest.php

But neither file exists as a document in Outline — the wiki holds project documentation, status tracking, and guides, not codebase file mirrors. There's nothing to sync these into.

What were you after? A few possibilities:

• Syncing docs to match recent code changes — I'd need to know which Outline doc(s) reference the audit commands table or tests, and I can update those.
• Creating new Outline docs from these files — I can do that if that's the intent.
• Something else entirely — in which case, tell me what you need and I'll get it done. 😏

All done, Boss. Here's the bottom line:

No documentation files changed in the last 3 days.

I checked all 30 most recent commits (July 21–22) — every single one is code: blade templates, PHP, Chrome/puppeteer fixes, UI tweaks, and broadcast regressions. Not a single .md file was touched.

The last docs-related commits were:

The docs/ directory currently holds 12 markdown files plus a settings/ subdirectory — all untouched since early July at the latest.

Nothing to sync. 😌